Resveratrol
The cautionary tale of the longevity field: a beautiful hypothesis, a retracted foundation, and a trial that found it made exercise work worse.
Also known as: nicotinamide mononucleotide, NR, nicotinamide riboside, NAD+ booster
They reliably raise NAD+ in humans. Whether raising NAD+ does anything you would notice is the question nobody has answered.
Human trials consistently confirm the biochemical effect — blood NAD+ rises, and the compounds are well tolerated. Functional outcomes are a different story: results are small, inconsistent, and confined to secondary endpoints in short trials.
NAD+ boosters are the flagship of the consumer longevity market, and they are a good test of whether you can tell a validated mechanism from a validated outcome.
The mechanism half is genuinely solid. NAD+ is essential to cellular metabolism and to the sirtuin enzymes that David Sinclair's lab made famous. It declines substantially with age across tissues. Give mice NMN and a startling range of things improve — insulin sensitivity, mitochondrial function, endurance, even some measures of vascular ageing. That is a real and reproducible animal literature.
The human half is where it thins out. The good news, and it is real, is that the compounds work biochemically: multiple well-conducted trials confirm that oral NR and NMN raise blood NAD+ substantially and are well tolerated over months. That is not nothing — plenty of supplements fail this basic test.
What has not followed is function. The Martens trial in middle-aged and older adults found NR raised NAD+ reliably and produced only a hint of blood-pressure and arterial-stiffness benefit in a subgroup. A Science paper in prediabetic women found NMN improved muscle insulin sensitivity — a real result on a real endpoint, in 25 people over ten weeks. Other trials report modest changes in walking speed or fatigue, and several report nothing. The pattern is a small literature of small trials, short durations, secondary endpoints, and inconsistent direction.
That is exactly what an early-stage research programme looks like, and it is being sold as a finished product at a hundred dollars a month. The regulatory picture adds to the mess: the FDA has taken the position that NMN is excluded from the supplement category because it was investigated as a drug, leaving its US availability unsettled.
There is also a mechanistic worry worth stating. NAD+ fuels PARP-mediated DNA repair and sirtuin activity, but some cancer cells are avid NAD+ consumers, and rodent work has raised the possibility of accelerated tumour progression. No human signal exists, and no trial has been long enough to find one.
Grade C is generous, and it reflects the mechanism and the tolerability. If you buy these, buy them knowing you are funding a hypothesis.
NAD+ is a coenzyme required for hundreds of redox reactions and is the obligatory substrate for sirtuins and PARPs, the enzyme families implicated in DNA repair and metabolic regulation. NAD+ declines with age. NMN and NR are precursors that raise it; the unproven link is whether restoring the molecule restores the function.
Well tolerated in trials up to a year at doses around 1,000 mg/day, with no consistent adverse-event signal. The honest caveat is duration: nobody has taken these for a decade under observation. The theoretical cancer concern — NAD+ supports proliferation in some tumour cell lines — has no human evidence behind it and no trial long enough to rule it out.
This guide is educational, not medical advice. Talk to a physician or pharmacist before starting any supplement, especially alongside prescription medication or a medical condition.
Evidence review last updated